CMTTdb

An integrated database for cancer molecular targeted thearpies

Entry Detail


General information
Database:DB00033
Objective:Panitumumab, a fully human antibody against the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), has activity in a subset of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Although activating mutations in KRAS, a small Gprotein downstream of EGFR, correlate with poor response to antiEGFR antibodies in mCRC, their role as a selection marker has not been established in randomized trials.
Authors:Amado RG, et al
Title:Wildtype KRAS is required for panitumumab efficacy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Journal:J Clin Oncol
Year:2008
PMID:18316791
Trial Design
Clinical Trial Id:numbers for studies 20020408 and 20030194 are NCT00113763 and NCT00113776
Agent:panitumumab
Target:Epidermal growth factor receptor
Cancer Type:colorectal cancer
Cancer Subtype:advanced colorectal cancer
Therapy Type:mono
Therapeutic Combination Type:NA
Therapeutic Combination Content:NA
Study Type:a phase III mCRC trial
Key Patients Feature:patients with metastatic colorectal cancer
Biomarker:KRAS mutation status;
Biomark Analysis:KRAS mutations were found in 43% of patients.
Control Group Info:best supportive care
Treatment Info:KRAS mutations were detected using polymerase chain reaction on DNA from tumor sections collected in a phase III mCRC trial comparing panitumumab monotherapy to best supportive care
Primary End Point:progression free survival (PFS) differed by KRAS status.
Secondary End Point:NA
Patients Number:427
Trial Results
DLT_MTD:NA
Objective Response Rate:Response rates to panitumumab were 17% and 0%, for the WT and mutant groups, respectively.
Disease Control Rate:NA
Median Time to Progression:NA
Median PFS A vs. C:The treatment effect on PFS in the wildtype (WT) KRAS group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.45; 95% CI: 0.34 to 0.59) was significantly greater (P < .0001) than in the mutant group (HR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.73 to 1.36). Median PFS in the WT KRAS group was 12.3 weeks for panitumumab and 7.3 weeks for BSC.
Median OS A vs. C:WT KRAS patients had longer overall survival (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.55 to 0.82; treatment arms combined). Consistent with longer exposure, more grade III treatmentrelated toxicities occurred in the WT KRAS group
Adverse Event(agent arm):No significant differences in toxicity were observed between the WT KRAS group and the overall population.
Conclusions:Panitumumab monotherapy efficacy in mCRC is confined to patients with WT KRAS tumors. KRAS status should be considered in selecting patients with mCRC as candidates for panitumumab monotherapy.