CMTTdb

An integrated database for cancer molecular targeted thearpies

Entry Detail


General information
Database:DB00273
Objective:To determine whether EMD 1201081, a TLR9 agonist, added to cetuximab had antitumor activity in secondline recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (R/M SCCHN).
Authors:Ruzsa A, et al
Title:Phase 2, openlabel, 1:1 randomized controlled trial exploring the efficacy of EMD 1201081 in combination with cetuximab in secondline cetuximabna ve patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (R/M SCCHN).
Journal:Invest New Drugs.
Year:2014
PMID:24894651
Trial Design
Clinical Trial Id:NCT01040832
Agent:EMD 1201081
Target:Tolllike receptor 9
Cancer Type:head and neck cancer
Cancer Subtype:advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma
Therapy Type:com
Therapeutic Combination Type:1
Therapeutic Combination Content:EMD1201081+ cetuximab
Study Type:a phase II, openlabel, I:I randomized controlled trial
Key Patients Feature:The patient population comprised adults with R/M SCCHN with disease progressing on a firstline cytotoxic chemotherapy regimen, measurable disease, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) 0 or 1.
Biomarker:NA
Biomark Analysis:NA
Control Group Info:single arm
Treatment Info:a trial of EMD 1201081 0.32 mg/kg subcutaneously weekly plus cetuximab (combination) vs cetuximab monotherapy (control) in cetuximabna ve patients with R/M SCCHN who progressed on 1 cytotoxic regimen.
Primary End Point:ORR, DCR, PFS, toxcity
Secondary End Point:NA
Patients Number:123
Trial Results
DLT_MTD:NA
Objective Response Rate:Objective response rate in both arms was 5.7% (95% CI 1.215.7%) by independent assessment.
Disease Control Rate:Disease control was 37.7% for patients on combination (24.852.1%) and 43.4% on control (29.857.7%).
Median Time to Progression:NA
Median PFS A vs. C:1.5 months (1.32.6) for patients on combination, and 1.9 months (1.52.9) on control
Median OS A vs. C:NA
Adverse Event(agent arm):The most frequent adverse events in the combination arm were rash (29.6%), acneiform dermatitis (22.2%), and injection site reactions (20.4%). Grade 3/4 dyspnea and hypokalemia were more frequent with cetuximab monotherapy (7.5% and 5.7% vs 1.9% each, respectively), and grade 3/4 respiratory failure and disease progression were more frequent with combination (5.6% each vs 1.9% each).
Conclusions:EMD 1201081 was well tolerated combined with cetuximab, but there was no incremental clinical efficacy.