CMTTdb

An integrated database for cancer molecular targeted thearpies

Entry Detail


General information
Database:DB00026
Objective:The NORDICVII multicenterphase III trial investigated the efficacy of cetuximab when added to bolus fluorouracil/folinic acid and oxaliplatin (Nordic FLOX), administered continuously or intermittently, in previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The influence of KRAS mutation status on treatment outcome was also investigated.
Authors:Tveit KM, et al
Title:Phase III trial of cetuximab with continuous or intermittent fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (Nordic FLOX) versus FLOX alone in firstline treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: the NORDICVII study.
Journal:J Clin Oncol.
Year:2012
PMID:22473155
Trial Design
Clinical Trial Id:NCT00145314
Agent:cetuximab
Target:Epidermal growth factor receptor
Cancer Type:colorectal cancer
Cancer Subtype:advanced colorectal cancer
Therapy Type:com
Therapeutic Combination Type:2
Therapeutic Combination Content:cetuximab+bolus fluorouracil/folinic acid + oxaliplatin (Nordic FLOX)
Study Type:The NORDICVII multicenterphase III trial
Key Patients Feature:Patients eligible for inclusion were 18 to 75 years of age and had previously untreated advanced/metastatic adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum, at least one measurable lesion according to RECIST criteria
Biomarker:NA
Biomark Analysis:NA
Control Group Info:3 arms: Nordic FLOX (arm A), cetuximab and FLOX (arm B), or cetuximab combined with intermittent FLOX (arm C)
Treatment Info:patients were randomly assigned to receive either standard Nordic FLOX (arm A), cetuximab and FLOX (arm B), or cetuximab combined with intermittent FLOX (arm C).
Primary End Point:progression free survival (PFS).
Secondary End Point:Overall survival (OS), response rate, R0 resection rate, and safety
Patients Number:566
Trial Results
DLT_MTD:NA
Objective Response Rate:NA
Disease Control Rate:NA
Median Time to Progression:NA
Median PFS A vs. C: In the ITT population, median PFS was 7.9, 8.3, and 7.3 months for the three arms, respectively (not significantly different). In patients with KRAS mutations, no significant difference was detected, although a trend toward improved PFS was observed in arm B.
Median OS A vs. C:OS was almost identical for the three groups (20.4, 19.7, 20.3 months, respectively), and confirmed response rates were 41%, 49%, and 47%, respectively. In patients with KRAS wildtype tumors, cetuximab did not provide any additional benefit compared with FLOX alone.
Adverse Event(agent arm):The regimens were well tolerated.
Conclusions:Cetuximab did not add significant benefit to the Nordic FLOX regimen in firstline treatment of mCRC.