CMTTdb

An integrated database for cancer molecular targeted thearpies

Entry Detail


General information
Database:DB00130
Objective:To assess the efficacy of everolimus in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma for whom sorafenib treatment failed.
Authors:Zhu AX, et al
Title:Effect of everolimus on survival in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma after failure of sorafenib: the EVOLVE1 randomized clinical trial.
Journal:JAMA.
Year:2014
PMID:25058218
Trial Design
Clinical Trial Id:NCT01035229.
Agent:everolimus
Target:Serine/threonineprotein kinase mTOR
Cancer Type:liver cancer
Cancer Subtype:advanced hepatocellular carcinoma failed after sorafenib
Therapy Type:mono
Therapeutic Combination Type:NA
Therapeutic Combination Content:NA
Study Type:a randomized, doubleblind, phase III study
Key Patients Feature:adults with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage B or C hepatocellular carcinoma and ChildPugh A liver function whose disease progressed during or after sorafenib or who were intolerant of sorafenib. Patients were enrolled from 17 countries between May 2010 and March 2012.
Biomarker:NA
Biomark Analysis:NA
Control Group Info:placebo
Treatment Info:7.5 mg/d, or matching placebo, both given in combination with best supportive care and continued until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. Per the 2:1 randomization scheme,
Primary End Point: overall survival.
Secondary End Point:time to progression and the disease control rate
Patients Number:546
Trial Results
DLT_MTD:NA
Objective Response Rate:NA
Disease Control Rate:disease control rate was 56.1% and 45.1%, respectively (P = .01).
Median Time to Progression:NA
Median PFS A vs. C:3.0 months and 2.6 months, respectively (HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.751.15)
Median OS A vs. C:303 deaths (83.7%) in the everolimus group and 151 deaths (82.1%) in the placebo group ([HR], 1.05; 95% CI, 0.861.27; P = .68; median overall survival, 7.6 months with everolimus, 7.3 months with placebo).
Adverse Event(agent arm):The most common grade 3/4 adverse events for everolimus vs placebo were anemia (7.8% vs 3.3%, respectively), asthenia (7.8% vs 5.5%, respectively), and decreased appetite (6.1% vs 0.5%, respectively). No patients experienced hepatitis C viral flare. Based on central laboratory results, hepatitis B viral reactivation was experienced by 39 patients (29 everolimus, 10 placebo); all cases were asymptomatic, but 3 everolimus recipients discontinued therapy.
Conclusions:Everolimus did not improve overall survival in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma whose disease progressed during or after receiving sorafenib or who were intolerant of sorafenib.