CMTTdb

An integrated database for cancer molecular targeted thearpies

Entry Detail


General information
Database:DB00603
Objective:Both the epidermal growth factor receptor and vascular endothelial growth factor pathways are frequently overexpressed in glioblastoma multiforme. This study combined bevacizumab, a vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitor, and erlotinib, an epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor, with standard radiation and temozolomide (TMZ), with the goal of improving overall survival (OS).
Authors:Clarke JL, et al
Title:A singleinstitutionphase II trial of radiation, temozolomide, erlotinib, and bevacizumab for initial treatment of glioblastoma.
Journal:Neuro Oncol.
Year:2014
PMID:24637230
Trial Design
Clinical Trial Id:NA
Agent:bevacizumab
Target:Vascular endothelial growth factor
Cancer Type:Tumors of the nervous system
Cancer Subtype:glioblastoma
Therapy Type:com
Therapeutic Combination Type:3
Therapeutic Combination Content:radiation, temozolomide, erlotinib, and bevacizumab
Study Type:A singleinstitutionphase II trial
Key Patients Feature:Inclusion criteria Age more than and equal to 18 y KPS more than and equal to 60 Newly diagnosed, surgically confirmed GBM or gliosarcoma, with studytreatment starting 3-5 wk after open surgery or 2-5 wk after biopsy Adequate bone marrow, liver, and kidney function
Biomarker:NA
Biomark Analysis:NA
Control Group Info:single arm
Treatment Info:Treatment consisted of fractionated radiotherapy to 60 Gy, with daily TMZ at 75 mg/m2/d and erlotinib 150200 mg/d (or 500600 mg/d for patients on enzymeinducing antiepileptic drugs). Bevacizumab was given at 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks, starting more than and equal to 4 weeks after surgery. After radiotherapy, adjuvant TMZ was given at 200 mg/m2/d ¡Á 5d per 28day cycle, with unchanged erlotinib and bevacizumab doses. Treatment continued until progression or for 12 months. Efficacy was compared against an institutional historical control. A sample of 55 patients was calculated to provide 85% potheyr to detect a hazard ratio of 0.67 for OS.
Primary End Point:OS
Secondary End Point:PFS and safety
Patients Number:59
Trial Results
DLT_MTD:NA
Objective Response Rate:NA
Disease Control Rate:NA
Median Time to Progression:NA
Median PFS A vs. C:13.5 months (vs 8.6 mo for HC, P = .03).
Median OS A vs. C:19.8 months (vs 18 mo for HC, P = .33)
Adverse Event(agent arm):The most frequent related grade 3/4 adverse effects were lymphopenia, thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, diarrhea, weight loss, and fatigue. One patient died of disseminated aspergillosis.
Conclusions:The combination of bevacizumab, erlotinib, TMZ, and radiotherapy appears to be well tolerated and improved progression free survival but did not reach the primary endpoint of improved OS.