CMTTdb

An integrated database for cancer molecular targeted thearpies

Entry Detail


General information
Database:DB01046
Objective:Fulvestrant With or Without Lapatinib in Treating Postmenopausal Women With Stage III or Stage IV Hormone ReceptorPositive Breast Cancer
Authors:Harold J. Burstein
Title:Endocrine therapy with or without inhibition of epidermal growth factor receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2: a randomized, doubleblind, placebocontrolledphase III trial of fulvestrant with or without lapatinib for postmenopausal women with hormone receptorpositive advanced breast cancerCALGB 40302 (Alliance).
Journal:journal of clinical oncology
Year:2014
PMID:25348000
Trial Design
Clinical Trial Id:NCT00390455
Agent:lapatinib
Target:Epidermal growth factor receptor
Receptor proteintyrosine kinase erbB2
Cancer Type:breast cancer
Cancer Subtype:breast cancer
Therapy Type:com
Therapeutic Combination Type:17
Therapeutic Combination Content:Endocrine therapy+laptinib
Study Type:A Randomized, DoubleBlind, PlaceboControlledphase III Trial of Fulvestrant With or Without Lapatinib for Postmenopausal Women With Hormone Receptor-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer
Key Patients Feature:Eligible women had estrogen receptor-positive and/or progesterone receptor-positive tumors, regardless of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2) status, and prior aromatase inhibitor treatment.
Biomarker:hormone receptorpositive
Biomark Analysis:For human epidermal growth factor receptor 2positive tumors, lapatinib was associated with longer median PFS (5.9 v 3.3 months), but the differential treatment effect by human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status was not significant (P = .53).
Control Group Info:Fulvestrant plus placebo
Treatment Info:fulvestrant 500 mg intramuscularly on day 1, followed by 250 mg on days 15 and 28 and every 4 weeks thereafter, and either lapatinib 1, 500 mg or placebo daily.
Primary End Point:progression free survival (PFS).
Secondary End Point:toxicity, objective tumor response, and overall survival (OS).
Patients Number:295
Trial Results
DLT_MTD:NA
Objective Response Rate:The incidence of objective response was 20% (95% CI, 13% to 29%) in the lapatinib arm compared with 9% (95% CI, 5% to 17%) in the placebo arm (P=.048)
Disease Control Rate:NA
Median Time to Progression:NA
Median PFS A vs. C:Median PFS was 4.7 months for lapatinib plus fulvestrant and 3.8 months for placebo plus fulvestrant. TheHR(placebo to lapatinib) for PFS was 1.04 (95% CI, 0.82 to 1.33; onesided P= .37).
Median OS A vs. C:The HR for OS was 0.91 (95% CI, 0.68 to 1.21; onesided P= .25). Median OS was 30 months for the lapatinib plus fulvestrant arm and 26.4 months for the placebo plus fulvestrant arm.
Adverse Event(agent arm):No grade 4 or 5 adverse events were reported. More patients receiving lapatinib experienced grade 3 adverse events (19% v 5%; P < .001), most commonly acneiform rash, diarrhea, fatigue, and elevations in serum transaminases. Of 285 patients who completed protocol therapy, 20 (7%) ended treatment early because of toxicity, more frequently in the lapatinib arm (12% v 2%; P= .001), resulting in diarrhea, fatigue, and rash. No grade 3 or 4 cardiac toxicity was reported.
Conclusions:Adding lapatinib to fulvestrant does not improve PFS or OS in advanced ERpositive breast cancer and is more toxic.